In the foregoing shares of our research, we encountered some difficulties at some point, which require more clarity. Eg., We have seen to approach the criticism that Marx moves to that Hegel, Feuerbach that the same moves in relation to the topic (religion e) fetishism. The result of this is that threatened to distort the meaning of those young pages, where Marx comes to terms with both the Fenomenoogia Hegel, that just the thought of Feuerbach. We go into the matter.
Engagement with the contents of the old world distracts us from the pigs apparently domnda-formal, but in fact essential \u0026lt;What relationship established with the dialectic hegeliana?>
Feuerbach, in his Thesis and philosophy of - toppled from the roots the old dialectic and the old philosophy (Marx, 1702: 108). [1] Feuerbach is the only one who has a serious critical relationship to the Hegelian dialectic, and that in this area has made genuine discoveries Feuerbach is 'real victor in the old philosophy. (Marx, 1702: 109). In this respect, interesting to note retrieve a page of Gramsci. [2]
"Lessons In philosophy of history, Hegel explains that the formal principle of the will, freedom of the abstract, simple unit that \u0026lt;we dell'auocoscienza, l'Io, is absolutely free and independent source of all determinations universali>, \u0026lt;tranqilla retained by the Germans a theory, but the French wanted to run praticamnte>. The passage of Hegel seems ... very imporant as 'source' of thought expressed in the Theses on Feuerbach that "philosophers have explained the world and now it is time to change it."
As you can see, even Gramsci was convinced that, in thesis, the core theoretical fundamental (if you will, the philosophical message to be received) is that the link- praxis philosophy [3]
[1] - It is' so devoid of conscience the ratio of new motion critical of the dialectic and Hegel's philosophy, which his critics, as Strauss and B. Bauer, in fact, are all prisoners of the Hegelian logic. " Kritik der Philosophie und überhaupt Hegelschen dialektik , in K. Marx, "Texte zu Methode und Praxis II. Pariser Manuskripte 1844, Rororo 1966: 107. The note well this observation, because most crimes will be given to the critics of Marx, in fact, against hegelisno '-in particular, to the left' - more than against Hegel properly. From now on I will mention this text with the abbreviation Marx, 1702 plus the page that interests you.
[2] - A. Gramsci, historical materialism and flosofia of Benedetto Croce, Turin 1952: 66.
[3] - I mean not a generic \u0026lt;fare>, but an act able to change the ratio of 'uono with society and nature. One of the prerequisites of Hegelian \u0026lt; realization of philosophy> is that it is essential exteriorize reality - ... "The Spirit / Geist is activity in the sense in which the Scholastics used to say of God that is absolute attuosità. But because the spirit is active, then externalized. We must not, therefore, examine the spirit as an entity without trial, as was the ancient metaphysics, which divides the inner god aprocessuale of its proceedings. Spirit / Geist to be examined primarily in its concrete reality, in its energy and its exteriorizations should be recognized as determined by its inner nature. " (Hegel, der Enzyklopödie philosophischen Wissenschaften .1: 101). activity (Tätigkeit ), Hegel writes in Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie .2 Suhrkamp 1971), is also change, but change that is the same as itself, has changed, but inside the universal, as the change that is equal to itself, is, in short, is a determination that a given himself. "" change is not contained in the simple fact of the keep in motion. The universal is active, is determined, and the purpose and self-determination and, thus, be realized. This determination is the key, we see that the universal recognized by Aristotle. "(Op.cit . .2). In this regard it is useful also to recall another satisfactory text: "Marx has never been strictly read-in L. Feuerbach Goldmann: the evolution of his thinking, however, was accomplished within a specific intellectual current and quite well defined: German radicals, mostly neo-Hegelian movement for the evolution of which the contribution was one of Feuerbach most important turning points. This contribution could be summarized in two basic ideas: I. The critical inquiry religious and philosophical speculation, and the need to bring these two forms of consciousness and representation of the world to their real essence and earthly: the sensitivity, the real human needs and aspirations. 2. The definition of man as having specific needs of the Other and not existing in the relationship between you and the 1'I0, report that basically Feuerbach conceived on the model family based on love in its authenticity. "(Goldmann, The German Ideology and the Theses on Feuerbach . 1969: 16).
0 comments:
Post a Comment